From Monday.com to Custom Software

One of the highest-volume Monday.com users in North America. 30,000+ orders per year. How I scaled them from Monday.com to low-code to custom software.

When this client first reached out, they were already one of the highest-volume Monday.com users in North America. Their goal: 10x their business over the next five years.

They were running almost everything on Monday.com — HR, marketing, sales, CRM, order management, and project delivery. Multiple teams across multiple markets, all coordinated through a single platform.

This is the story of how I pushed Monday.com to its limits, transitioned critical systems to low-code tools, and eventually moved to fully custom software — all while the business kept growing.

This is the same client featured in the video testimonial on my About page. Details have been anonymized.


Phase 1: The Monday.com Foundation

What They Had Built

When I came on board, they'd already invested heavily in Monday.com:

They were on Monday.com Enterprise — the highest tier available — and had integrated it with various tools through native automations.

The Cracks Started Showing

At first, the problems seemed manageable.

Board Limits: Monday.com Enterprise caps boards at 30,000 items. With 30,000+ orders per year, they were hitting this wall constantly. The workaround? Archive completed orders to separate boards. But this broke reporting, made historical lookups painful, and fragmented their data.

Performance Degradation: As boards grew, everything slowed. Load times increased. Automations became unreliable. Team members started avoiding certain views because they took too long.

Reporting Limitations: Monday.com's native dashboards couldn't handle the complexity they needed. Calculating margins, payouts, and performance metrics across thousands of records required workarounds on top of workarounds.

Data Integrity Issues: Multiple people editing boards simultaneously. Data inconsistencies crept in. Dropdown values changed. Records duplicated. No source of truth.

They hadn't done anything wrong. They'd just outgrown the platform.


Phase 2: Extending with Make.com

Before abandoning Monday.com entirely, I tried to extend it. Make.com became the integration layer.

What I Built

Automations that:

The Results

Make.com bought us time. It papered over Monday.com's limitations and let the business keep scaling.

But it created new problems:

Increased Complexity: More automations meant a harder system to understand and maintain. Debugging meant tracing through dozens of scenarios across multiple platforms.

Cost Escalation: Make.com pricing is operation-based. At their volume, automation costs became significant — and unpredictable.

Fragile Dependencies: Multiple points of failure. A Monday.com API hiccup could cascade through Make.com scenarios and break downstream processes.

I'd extended Monday.com's life. But I hadn't solved the fundamental problem: the platform wasn't designed for this scale.


Phase 3: The Low-Code Pivot

This was the turning point.

Monday.com and Make.com weren't going to cut it for the next phase. Not because they're bad tools — they're not. But at this scale, you need more control over data, performance, and system design.

The Architecture Decision

I moved the most critical systems — CRM, order management, and financial reporting — off Monday.com entirely.

The new stack:

Component Technology Why
Database PostgreSQL on Supabase True relational data model, no item limits, SQL power
Admin Dashboard Retool Rapid development, powerful visualization, no frontend code
Automation Make.com Still useful for integrations and workflows
Field Operations Monday.com Kept for what it does well — task management and team coordination

What We Gained

Unlimited Data: No more 30,000-item limits. Historical data stays accessible forever. Queries run fast regardless of volume.

Real Relational Modeling: Instead of forcing everything into Monday.com's "board-item-subitem" structure, I could model the business properly:
- Orders → Line Items → Products
- Clients → Orders → Attribution
- Service Providers → Markets → Management hierarchies
- Payout tiers → Commission calculations

SQL-Powered Analytics: Complex financial calculations — revenue, COGS, margins, payouts — now ran as SQL queries completing in milliseconds.

Timezone Handling: Proper date/time management. No more confusion about when an order was placed or which pay period it belonged to.

Audit Trails: Every change tracked. Every calculation reproducible.

What Stayed on Monday.com

Monday.com didn't disappear. It remained the system for:

The key insight: use each tool for what it does best.


Phase 4: Custom Software

By late 2025, even Retool started showing limitations. The client's ambitions had grown:

Retool excels at internal tools. But when you need customer-facing applications, complex UX, or complete control over the experience, you need custom code.

The Transition

I didn't throw everything away. The PostgreSQL database from Phase 3 became the foundation. Data models, business logic, and integrations carried forward.

What changed:
- Custom frontend applications replaced Retool for specific use cases
- API layer gave complete control over data access and business rules
- Infrastructure ownership meant no more platform limits or pricing surprises

Current State

Today, they operate a hybrid system:

They're positioned to 10x without hitting platform ceilings again.


Lessons for Monday.com Users

1. Know the Limits Before You Hit Them

Monday.com Enterprise caps boards at 30,000 items. If you're processing thousands of transactions per year, plan for this:

2. Monday.com Excels at Task Management, Not Data Management

Monday.com is fundamentally a task and project management tool. It's been extended to handle CRM, inventory, and other use cases — but those extensions have limits.

If your use case is:
- Collaborative task management → Monday.com is excellent
- High-volume transactional data → Consider purpose-built alternatives

3. Low-Code Tools Buy Time and Build Skills

Make.com and Retool served as bridges. They let me extend Monday.com's capabilities while building the data models and business logic that would eventually power custom software.

This phased approach meant:
- The business never stopped operating
- I validated data models before investing in custom development
- The team learned to think in terms of proper data architecture

4. The Right Tool Changes as You Scale

A startup might legitimately run their entire business on Monday.com — and that's fine. But a company processing 30,000 orders per year with 10x growth ambitions needs different infrastructure.

There's no shame in outgrowing a tool. It means you've grown.

5. Data Architecture Matters More Than Tools

The most valuable work wasn't choosing Retool or Supabase or any specific tool. It was designing the data model:

These questions have the same answers regardless of what software runs the queries. Get the data model right, and changing tools becomes manageable.


Is This Path Right for You?

Not every business needs this trajectory.

Stay on Monday.com if:
- Data volumes are manageable (under 10,000 active items per board)
- Reporting needs are straightforward
- Your team values the visual, intuitive interface
- You're not hitting performance issues

Extend with Make.com if:
- You need integrations Monday.com doesn't natively support
- You want to enforce data validation rules
- You need multi-step workflows across boards
- You're willing to manage automation complexity

Migrate critical data if:
- You're hitting item limits regularly
- Performance is a daily frustration
- You need complex calculations Monday.com can't handle
- Data integrity is a constant battle
- You're planning significant growth

Build custom software if:
- You need customer-facing applications
- Your business processes are truly unique
- You want complete control over your tech stack
- You have the budget and resources to maintain it


Final Thoughts

Monday.com didn't fail this client. It served them well during a critical growth phase. But every platform has limits, and part of professional system design is recognizing when you're approaching them.

The goal was never to use Monday.com forever. The goal was to build a business that could scale. The tools had to evolve along with that ambition.

If you're running a Monday.com implementation and seeing signs of strain, you're not alone — and there are proven paths forward.


For questions about scaling Monday.com implementations or transitioning to other platforms, reach out here.

Share this article
LinkedIn Facebook X